Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Monday, November 5, 2012

NNSA defends LANL analysis

Anonymoulsy contributed:

NNSA defends LANL analysis

This is a complex letter to DNFSB on PF 4. The bottom line is that this is still a work in progress.

http://www.dnfsb.gov/board-activities/letters/doe-response-board-june-18-2012-letter-which-issued-reporting-requirement-c
By at

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

It's funy but I dont really know who has less credibility NNSA or LANL. Both are a laughing stock.

11/06/2012 8:13 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days

  • LLNL un-diversity
    Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualification...
  • NIF
    Good article in Nature News on progress on Z with a mention of NIF's problems http://www.nature.com/news/triple-threat-method-sparks-h...
  • Salary facts
    " ...If there were damning factual evidence of anything untoward, it would obviously have been brought forward with great fanfare......