Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Shocking news report - NNSA budgets not credible!

Anonymously contributed:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shocking news report - NNSA budgets not credible!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing in this article is a surprise, but having it all put together in one story is pretty damning. Four major construction projects (LANL, Y-12, LANL again, and LLNL), each over budget, behind schedule, and failing to meet performance specs -- it has been a busy six months for NNSA. Not to mention that there was still time to have the Y-12 nun breach and the LANL radiation exposures.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The B61′s cost and schedule problems compound increasing difficulties the agency faces as a result of repeated instances of similar problems on other major nuclear weapons projects.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

♦ In February, the agency was forced to indefinitely defer work on a new plutonium laboratory after its estimated cost ballooned from $800 million in 2007 to an estimated $4 billion to $6 billion, too much for the agency’s budget.

♦ Last month, agency officials acknowledged they had to redesign a similar multi-billion dollar building they are trying to build to do nuclear weapons work in Tennessee after realizing the current design is too small to hold the equipment needed.

♦ Also last month, the agency acknowledged that a new $213 million security system at Los Alamos National Laboratory’s most sensitive nuclear facility did not work, forcing the lab to spend significant extra money to add the necessary guards to keep a major stockpile of nuclear weapons-usable plutonium safe while the agency figures out how to finish the project.

♦ In September, the agency acknowledged that the $5 billion National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, built for $5 billion over more than a decade to support nuclear weapons research, had failed to achieve its goals in simulating the fusion blast of a weapon."

http://www.abqjournal.com/main/2012/11/04/news/billions-more-needed-to-refurbish-bombs.html

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Of course it's going to take more people and money. All the ludicrous red tape, layers of rules, imported managers from partners and 10x cost management contracts drive up expenses. All the players have gotten big increases except the workers, who keep taking home less and less every year. Thanks Sec. Chu. thanks Congress. You reap what you sow.

Anonymous said...

I don't mind so much the increased cost, so long as they are offsetting it by deprioritizing other programs (no clear evidence of this yet). LEP needs to be done. NNSA's "science" portfolio is of much lesser importance.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days