Why doesn't SPSE collect information from both members and non-members on LLNS Staff Relations practices to collectively demonstrate SR operational patterns instead of letting individual LLNS employees be "picked off" by the SR system?
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
Comments
December 3, 2014 at 8:29 PM
OK, you thank SPSE for the fact that you got to "work in hell"??
Just what exactly did SPSE do for your money ($300 per year)?? Since they have never had legal authority to bargain for LLNL employees?
$300 a year was a lose change compared to the work SPSE put in to fight off the fangs of the lab for me. I am grateful to have SPSE at the lab. I was a member of SPSE. I recommend every employee to join the society.