BLOG purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Don't argue with data!

Women are better than men

http://www.forbes.com/sites/victorlipman/2015/04/16/are-women-really-as-this-major-research-says-better-managers-than-men/

- With male managers and male employees, engagement level is 25%.
- With female managers and male employees, engagement level is 29%.
- With male managers and female employees, engagement level is 31%.
- With female managers and female employees, engagement level is 35%.

Gallup’s overall conclusion? “Organizations should hire and promote more female managers. Female managers in the U.S. exceed male managers at meeting employees’ essential workplace requirements.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics - Mark Twain

There are two theories to arguing with a woman. Neither Works. - Will Rogers

Anonymous said...

Thank you for the additional link. I've been collecting articles from mainstream publications about sex superiority. So far, I've come across 26 recent articles that claim women are better than men at given tasks. I've come across 0 articles that claim men are better than women at given tasks.

The conclusion is that either women are better than men at everything, or that these articles and the people who report them are examples of misandry (hatred of men).

A journalist or anyone who wrote that men are better than women (or that whites are better than blacks) would be immediately fired -regardless of the data. But it is acceptable and even encouraged to write the opposite.

These articles say much more about the overwhelming discrimination against men than anything else.

Anonymous said...

A lot depends on exactly what "engaged" means, doesn't it? A man probably would have undestood that, but the man-hating woman who wrote the article didn't. Hmm.

Anonymous said...

The article is from Forbes. Hardly a lightweight organization...
.. and a strategy being followed by the lab that will pay dividends.

Anonymous said...

A journalist or anyone who wrote that men are better than women (or that whites are better than blacks) would be immediately fired -regardless of the data. But it is acceptable and even encouraged to write the opposite.

July 15, 2015 at 5:55 AM

Harvard PhD candidate is an example:

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/05/17/kennedy-school-students-demand-inquiry-into-immigration-thesis/6Izovn4svIW6jvlm7VSDFO/story.html#

Get Educated!

Anonymous said...

These articles say much more about the overwhelming discrimination against men than anything else.

July 15, 2015 at 5:55 AM

What discrimination? Care to give any examples, or is it just your inferiority complex going bonkers?

LANL: Out of the 5 PADs, name the woman. (Hint: nobody)

Anonymous said...

I can show data that any race I choose is better than any other. BS is BS. Noise is noise. It stinks no matter which hooker pitches it.

The key is competent analysis.

Anonymous said...

I manage better than anyone else I now, female or male, LGBT or traditional approach . If you worked with me, you know it. More by absence than presence. You worked better

Anonymous said...

You cite a poll as data?

Non compus menus

Anonymous said...

This must explain the reason I see more homeless men
with cardboard signs asking for money at the street
corners then women.

Blog Archive