Anonymously contributed:
DOE alters bid policies for national labs
How was this overlooked?
I guess we don’t care or are just so in agreement with current contracting practice.
DOE alters bid policies for national labs
RICHLAND — The Department of Energy no longer will automatically seek bids for management of national laboratories, including Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and may instead renew agreements with current contractors.
In a new policy statement, Energy Secretary Steven Chu said that the practice common under the previous presidential administration DOE alters bid policies for national labs under Chu's leadership, the decision on whether to open management contracts for competition will be decided case by case.
I know a few M&Os that would like to apply this decision retroactively.
Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
So what do the NNSA labs do under the the 2nd Trump administration ? What are the odds we will have a test?
-
Do you remember how hard it was to get a Q clearance? You needed a good reputation, good credit and you couldn't lie about anything. We...
-
The end of LANL and LLNL? "After host Maria Bartiromo questioned whether the two plan to “close down entire agencies,” Ramaswamy said...
14 comments:
I bet deep in the inner circles of UC they are happy with the new arrangement. They get more money. They have partners - the experts in business practices, security, facilities et al, that they can blame when things go wrong. And usually the things that go wrong are on those areas. Of course if NIF doesn't pan out, the SCIENCE portion of this deal falls under the UC's arena of expertise.
The contract allowed them to drop an older population of workers. I wonder if the group health insurance rates dropped a little for UC due to that fact.
UC got a limited liability contract. DOE had wanted UC to take responsibility, and they dodged that bullet again with the new contract.
With a private corporation comes a less transparent ownership. Those smoke filled rooms in the back now have locks on them.
And not only did UC get more money than what they were getting before, there are taxes to be paid and UC (through the state budget) gets a tiny piece of that pie.
And the lab employees who got shafted - well they never were REAL UC employees, just step kids - the red headed ones you don't put out the good china for.
So LLNL and LANL are now stuck with LLNS/LANS LLC (also know as Bechtel & BWXT) permanently.
That's just great, Dr. Chu!
oops! I made a mess... the next to last paragraph should read:
In a new policy statement, Energy Secretary Steven Chu said that the practice common under the previous presidential administration of routinely opening the lab contracts to competition often did not have the expected benefits of saving money and improving efficiency.
Under Chu's leadership, the decision on whether to open management contracts for competition will be decided case by case.
http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/northwest/story/1064168.html
What a sweetheart deal this for these two contractor.
It cost 1/10 or less for UC to manage the lab, it's employees and better benefits and we even had a real retirement program. Now we're willing to give $80M + a year for eternity to some for profit company, that's 10X times what it use to cost; for them cto gut and destroy LLNL, it's people and all she use to be. Way to go boneheads.
http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/northwest/story/1064168.html
...routinely opening the lab contracts to competition often did not have the expected benefits of saving money and improving efficiency.
Wow...it took them this long to figure out it costs ~20x to run LANL with LANS than it did with UC.
Sheer genius in DC. We really do get the government we deserve.
My first reaction was that this was more conspiracy to keep Bechtel in control of our Nuclear Weapons Laboratories.
I hope this is not true. I want to believe that Chu knows better, that he knows how bad Bloody Bechtel is for this country and DOE's "crown jewels".
I hope that despite the option to simply renew, that Chu, with the support of Obama will open the bidding and open the question of how/why Bechtel got it's whole body in the tent and get them back out.
It may be way too late to undo any of the significant damage that turning LANL/LLNL over to Bechtel has done, but it is still worth doing.
Dr. Chu care little about the nuclear weapons complex that makes up over 2/3rds of his annual DOE budget. He would just as soon let them rot away under the LLCs while he pursues his own "green" agenda.
This is a man who still takes Global Warming seriously, even after the UN climate researchers have been exposed as being fakes and charlatans.
I have an idea. Give LLNL back to UC and give us back our retirement whereby we'll get service and years of credit back so we can all leave when we orignally intended.
Chu thinks we should paint all roofs white to fight global warming. Someone should tell him it's unnecessary since they're all covered with snow. Global warming?
The bad news is there's NO HOPE for the labs ever again. They're now in the hands of corporate America where CEO and ULM get the high wages and perks while the labor force is farmed out to the universities and foreign nationals, some of which will be overseas. Again, this will create a job shortage in America and eventually skilled labor to be abolished. This nations been on the wrong path since NAFTA and it's spiraling out of control more rapidly ten ever. All that could possibly turn this country around is a dictator with a brain who'd focus on what was good for the American people not the corporations. As you can see the president has virtually no power to make jobs.
February 12, 2010 4:06 PM: "As you can see the president has virtually no power to make jobs."
And that's the way it is supposed to be in a free country. Equality of opportunity, not of outcome. The best prevail. Government is limited and representative. Hell, why try to paraphrase the Founding Fathers? They said it best in the Constitution. We should pay attention, especially now.
February 12, 2010 7:58 PM
If this be the case we're in for a rocky road for decades to come. Maybe the 2035 recovery date I see advertise by the news media and "Walk Away" is more realistic then one wants to believe.
When Bechtel place their hooks into a stable and lucrative source of profits, they never let go.
Both LLNL and LANL have no further future as world class "science" labs. Bechtel will see to that. The money to be made in running the NNSA labs lay elsewhere.
DOE might as well just come out and say,
"All future NNSA lab contracts will be non-competitively handed over to Bechtel and BWXT".
The fix is clearly "in".
Post a Comment