Institute for Policy Studies article:
http://www.ips-dc.org/reports/doe_fy_2011_budget_request
Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
Good article in Nature News on progress on Z with a mention of NIF's problems http://www.nature.com/news/triple-threat-method-sparks-h...
-
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualification...
-
" ...If there were damning factual evidence of anything untoward, it would obviously have been brought forward with great fanfare......
2 comments:
"And, unfortunately, nuclear energy isn't safe or clean and it's too costly for the nation."
This is utter BS. Nuclear naval aircraft carrier have been all over this world with no issue what so ever. Ever wonder why we don't build our nuclear reactors offshore? If there's a problem we simply sink them.
The only reason I can think of is it'll take money out of the rich oil compny owners pockets.
Even though the department hasn’t built a new nuclear weapon for 20 years, its weapons complex is spending at rates comparable to that during the height of the nuclear arms race in the 1950s.
Hey, we're busy dismantling ~200, or so, weapons every year. In the 80's & 90's we dismantled 1500-2000 year but now we're just so much more "safer" (aka, Risk Averse).
Post a Comment