LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.
Comments
Sandia has always been the "good lab" while LANL is is the problem child that needs to be beaten. Sandia has one scandal with of illegal lobbying, LANL: Wen Ho Lee, stolen mustangs, fires, disks behind copiers, culture of theft, cowboy culture, lab shut down, arrogant scientists, buttheads, meth and secrets, blowing up buildings, broken fences, WHIP, corrupt deputy directors, people who think they are better than others, more fires, stolen gold, drug testing, WHIP, blinding students with lasers, electrical fires, broken fences and it goes on and on.
I think it is clear that Sandia is not the leper child, but the good studious child that makes a mistake every once in awhile like we all do. LANL is the incorrigible delinquent, LLNL is the fat dumb kid that everyone picks on, NTS is the invisible child that never says anything. Oak Ridge is the child that has gone on the Ivy league and will soon start a job as an investment banker. DOE is the stern but fair father trying to deal with a large and diverse family. NNSA is the mentally disturbed mother on prozac.