Skip to main content

Talk that LANS will be gone shortly

More talk that LANS will be gone shortly and that there will be an interim entity
runing LANL (UC?) for a year before the next contract bid. It is that bad for LANS.
September 16, 2015 at 8:08 AM
Delete
Anonymous Anonymous said...
UC 'running' LANL is what led to the current mess.
September 16, 2015 at 11:44 AM
Delete
Anonymous Anonymous said...
No, Pete Dominici is what led to the current mess.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Never going to happen. These rumors are worthless. LANS is on track, on budget and dedicated to the long term management of LANL as a scientific center of excellence.

You need to re-watch McMillan's latest All-Hands talk ( it's great stuff! ), esp. the discussions on "Belief" and then start giving 110% to the LANS team effort or get out.
Anonymous said…
Stop drinking the super-VUCA Kool aid.
Anonymous said…

I hear one of the team building activities that was proposed for management was to actually bring out ceremonial Kool aid as it is suppose to symbolize loyalty or something.
Anonymous said…
There is no, none, nada, nothing, in talk among LANL staff about "LANS being gone" soon. Just rabble-rousing on the part of some wishful thinkers. Most employees are just trying to get their jobs done. The small but persistent cadre of malcontents and chaos-seekers will of course do what they do best. Nothing new here.
Anonymous said…
The "small cadre" is 6:53 and 7:18 (likely the same person).
Anonymous said…
The "small cadre" is 6:53 and 7:18 (likely the same person).

September 19, 2015 at 7:39 AM

There is a word for the mistaken assumption that a subset (posters on this blog) of a whole (LANL employees) reflects the characteristics of the whole (e.g., demographics, opinions), but I'm too bored to try to remember what it is.
Anonymous said…
Yeah, apparently the LAO (Leback) just adores Charlie "GQ" McMillan. I've seen her "cuddle up" to Charlie in meetings. It's enough to make you barf.
Anonymous said…
Rumor has it that our good friends at Bechtel are coming to fix the problems. Unfortunately, they are part of the problem by dropping in people who are not committed to the lab or the mission, cost too much money, and leave before somebody figures out that they cause the problems. The sane can be said for BWXT and URS.
Anonymous said…
Rumor has it that our good friends at Bechtel are coming to fix the problems. Unfortunately, they are part of the problem by dropping in people who are not committed to the lab or the mission, cost too much money, and leave before somebody figures out that they cause the problems. The sane can be said for BWXT and URS.

September 23, 2015 at 8:00 PM

Didn't Bechtel arrive at the Labs 9-years ago? Or is that their excuse for screwing the Labs over; that they just arrived? Or does that mean that their destruction has just begun? If so, we are in for a long-haul.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.