- ST&E (UC)
- FY16: 95%
- FY15: 92%
- FY14: 30%
- FY13: 95%
- FY12: Very Good
- O&I (Bechtel)
- FY16: 74%
- FY15: 49%
- FY14: 0%
- FY13: 49%
- FY12: Good
Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
THIS BLOG WILL NOT POST ANY MAGA PROPAGANDA OR ANY MISINFORMATION REGARDLESS OF SOURCE.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Sunday, July 16, 2017
LANL performance stats
Looking at the recent last 5 years of NNSA annual performance evaluation reports for LANL on the NNSA website, if the science, technology & engineering (ST&E) goal component is attributed to UC and operations & infrastructure (O&I) to Bechtel, can anyone see Bechtel or a bidding team with Bechtel in it having a chance at the new LANL contract if this forms the basis for the RFP's past performance criteria.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6800/e680093c465d7f4bee2abaa4d927d77608678379" alt=""
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
Any regular readers in HR or management got a timeline on coming layoffs?
-
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualification...
-
What will DOGE think about the excessive number of LLNL managers, many with zero technical talent themselves, assigned to “rank” the engin...
No comments:
Post a Comment