Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
LLNS Contract discussion
SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE
Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...
-
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will have a huge negative effect on the ...
-
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises t...
-
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref...
9 comments:
Define 'we.'
The employees of Los Alamos National Laboratory. Or we can continue with the victim-hood mentality.
There are not, and never have been, "employees of Los Alamos National Laboratory." There were employees of UC, then there were employees of LANS. Pay attention to who signs your paycheck.
*Sigh* We will never have a serious blog....
*Sigh* We will never have a serious blog....
August 6, 2017 at 12:03 AM
You should consider that you might be the only person here who wants one.
7:58 AM , more than considering that.... A community of distinguished persons and the consensus is becoming that we would rather just rant at each other rather than have productive discussions.
Let the inmates run the asylum.....sounds like a fine idea.
What could possibly go wrong with that?
Now, now it isn't nice to pick on McMillan, Bishop, Webster, Wallace and Leasure. While it may be correct that that they are all UC lifers, it isn't their fault that LANL has fallen on bad times. Face it, they did the best that they could and just were not up to the requirements of the job.
Now, now it isn't nice to pick on McMillan, Bishop, Webster, Wallace and Leasure. While it may be correct that that they are all UC lifers, it isn't their fault that LANL has fallen on bad times. Face it, they did the best that they could and just were not up to the requirements of the job.
Post a Comment