Skip to main content

Disgruntled scientist

Image
By
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jan/29/us-nuclear-scientist-secretly-taped-by-fbi-claiming-he-could-bomb-new-york

So... this is what you guys do on your off time?

Comments

Anonymous said…
This guy looks like a real loser, a mediocre scientist who never amounted to anything, and was mad that he was not treated like a golden boy that his parents told him he was since he was (and still is) a sniveling red-faced spoiled brat.
1/29/2015 2:32 PM
Anonymous said…
alzheimers
1/31/2015 12:33 AM
Anonymous said…
Security problems caused by aging nuclear scientists who suffer the ravages of dementia along with the associated problems of reduced financial support as the dementia worsen is an issue that has never been successfully solved.

This guy was probably not in his right mind and he doesn't seem to have aged very well. When you combine dementia along with deep bitterness, you have a very poisonous cocktail.

1/31/2015 7:41 PM
Anonymous said…
January 31, 2015 at 7:41 PM

He was in trouble more than 15 years ago.
2/02/2015 9:02 AM
Anonymous said…
Give this guy a break Livermore. He was obsessed with fusion just like the rest of you nerds "at Livermore" working on NIF. Who's to say his ideas are any more or less asinine than the NIF concept?
2/02/2015 5:08 PM
Anonymous said…
NIF guys don't threaten to sell nuclear weapons technology to Venezuela, nor do they threaten to blow up NYC.
2/02/2015 6:17 PM
Anonymous said…
He wasn't "threatening" he was just trying, very incompetently, to try to sell something he really never had, to people who never really paid him any attention. A failed fusion scientist trying to sell bomb knowledge he never even had access to.
2/02/2015 9:13 PM
Anonymous said…
wow he is a bigger loser than I originally thought.
2/02/2015 9:37 PM
Anonymous said…
Who's to say his ideas are any more or less asinine than the NIF concept?

Duh? Peer Review.

Keep it real.
2/03/2015 6:23 PM
Anonymous said…
Who's to say his ideas are any more or less asinine than the NIF concept?

February 3, 2015 at 6:23 PM

Obviously, those who knew his ideas and knew they were nuts. Duh.
2/03/2015 8:37 PM
Anonymous said…
The dude wasn't any good as a scientist.
2/04/2015 9:06 PM
Anonymous said…
Yet his wife, sentenced before him, was an excellent editor/compositor in the publications organization at LANL.
2/04/2015 9:58 PM
Anonymous said…
you forgot to add "criminal" and "traitor" to the description of her tenure while at LANL.
2/05/2015 5:55 PM
Anonymous said…
Okay okay. "failure" is the wrong term. "mediocre" is being a bit more generous though.
2/05/2015 9:48 PM
Anonymous said…
Oh you all should just stop insulting the wacky theoretical physicist. Go read some LANL POGO Blogs or maybe a little off the FAS. Or maybe think about this...what to do when you get ousted by management after YOUR project actually underwent Peer review and was approved while the other one that got all the money was simply a coffer for politicians and management...

Or...go read Sun in a Bottle...Should be called "Backstabbers on Ignition"...or something...fusion physicists are a mean bunch...
10/13/2015 10:49 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more