Skip to main content

The return of Tyler Pryzbylek

Tyler Pryzbylek was rehired by NNSA. Load the shotguns.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Gee, when will Capt'n Tom D'Agostino return, too?

D'Agostino was the sole person that NNSA used to determine the contract winner in the bidding contest which selected LANS as the contractor for LANL. Soon after that event, he moved up to the top position at NNSA.

After the LANL lab contract, Tom's BFF, Tyler Pryzbylek, was the sole person that NNSA used to select LLNS as the prime contractor for LLNL.

No committee or "peer review" was used in selecting the nuclear weapon lab contractors. Only the single vote of these two men was used. That, in and of itself, should have raised serious red flags with the GAO IG regarding the honest competition of federal lab contractor winners.

To see a slick lawyer like Tyler Pryzbylek now being allowed back into a lead position over at NNSA is very disheartening.


Tyler Przybylek said…
I am not being rehired by NNSA, not I have received any preferential treatment form NNSA on anything.

After my retirement in 2008 from govenrment service I didnot hold an executive position with any NNSA contractor.

Finally, I recognize that we have had disagreements in the past but I have never lied to any of you.
Anonymous said…
The previous posting was substantially equivalent to the truth
Anonymous said…
Tyler Pryzbylek personally caused great damage to both weapons laboratories.

His name lives in infamy in the weapons complex.

He is hated.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...