Report says Los Alamos National Lab Failed to Protect Classified Information
Updated: 01/28/2015 10:12 PM | Created: 01/28/2015 9:19 PM
By: Danielle Todesco, KOB Eyewitness News 4
It has just been one problem after another for the Los Alamos National Laboratory as of late. This week alone, several of those problems are in the headlines.
The latest problem out of LANL is a new report obtained by our partners at the Santa Fe New Mexican. It shows that a classification officer at LANL failed to protect classified information, and because of that, there were six different incidents where information involving national security was wrongly released.
It is also hard to forget the radiation leak at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, which was blamed on LANL. Investigators say workers at LANL started using a different kind of kitty litter for packing, which caused a barrel to burst.
State Representative David Gallegos says he hopes to work with the representative who serves Los Alamos to see how the state can help prevent any more problems at LANL.
"Right away, disappointment came to my mind because, like I say, they've been under the microscope since the incident at the WIPP site, so it's one of those things. When you're being viewed that closely...you're going to find errors," Representative Gallegos said. "It also gives you the opportunity to upgrade the way you do business, and I was disappointed that they've gotten more problems than what was already revealed."
LANL officials released this brief statement on the release of classified information:
"The lab is looking at addressing the issues raised in the report through a set of corrective actions."
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email firstname.lastname@example.org
- ► 2017 (291)
- ► 2016 (295)
- Los Alamos National Lab Failed to Protect Classifi...
- State: LANL, WIPP will face steeper fines
- Disgruntled scientist
- Goldstein and his whip
- Dear Scooby
- Wrong doings by LANLs Classification Officer
- LANL Vents Toxic Ground Vapors, Raising Air Qualit...
- Did the culture of reprisal at LANSLLNS contribute...
- NEW EEOICPA SPECIAL EXPOSURE COHORT PETITION QUALI...
- So how does it go down from here?
- Los Alamos has highest fraction of millionaires in...
- Are LANL retirees being forced onto Obamacare?
- Value of NNSA Field Offices at LANL and LLNL?
- LANS 2014 performance evaluation review is now pos...
- Rebranding the nuclear weapons complex won't refor...
- retirement incentive" in FY2016 at LLNL?
- Bob and Jennifer
- 2014 fellows of the American Physical Society
- NNSA head warns of budget cuts
- LLNL in 30-60 months
- LANL leadership merits harsh evaluation
- Miller, Albright, and Goldstein
- Disgruntled males
- POGO's take on LANL contract
- DOE trying to weasel out.
- 3 top managers
- Who is the most-hated man in the WC?
- Career FTE attractiveness to LLNS Programs with a ...
- Good thing we split out!
- LLNS Staff Relations
- RIF question
- LANS makes the #1 slot for the company with the wo...
- More on the return of Tyler Pryzbylek
- DOE and NNSA now believe BOTH weapons labs need a ...
- The difference in performance between LANL and LLN...
- The return of Tyler Pryzbylek
- Will NNSA repeat mistake?
- Former Employee Files Suit Against LANS, Co-worker...
- Will the loss in LANS contract affect LLNS's?
- LANS lost a year earned earlier
- ▼ January (41)
- ► 2014 (309)
- ► 2013 (431)
- ► 2012 (258)
- ► 2011 (162)
- ► 2010 (157)
- ► 2009 (231)
- ► 2008 (374)