BLOG purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Friday, January 2, 2015

The difference in performance between LANL and LLNL

The difference in performance between LANL and LLNL is due entirely to the organizational design and performance of their engineering disciplines. LLNL engineering is strong, active, and self-sustaining. LANL Engineering is haphazard, marginalized and and dependent on individuals.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

...is due entirely...

I am proud of LLNL Engineering, but even if I had great knowledge of LANL Engineering I would not ascribe differences between two complex organizations like national labs to any one thing.

LLNL often feels an existential threat, so perhaps it goes to the line attributed to Samuel Johnson:

"Depend upon it, sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully."

Anonymous said...

Or in the present day case of the LANSLLNS family:

"He Ain't Heavy, He's My Brother" -The Hollies


Anonymous said...

...and how many LLNL systems remain in the active stockpile? And being given a LANL system doesn't count.

Blog Archive