Skip to main content

LANL needs university

The LANL bid team will have to have a university partner in it. This was not necessary for SNL, as it is seen historically as an engineering first lab. Remember this was the whole reason it was spun off (Z Division) from LANL after WWII. 

Btw, I keep hearing rumors that Bechtel and UC are not playing well together on the LLNL operations. I can see a divorce coming in the future, especially if LANS breaks up.

Comments

Anonymous said…
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Before claiming that the SNL bid teams were devoid of university interactions, try reading the RFP.
Anonymous said…
December 18, 2016 at 10:45 AM

From the Wall Street Journal...

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.—A unit of Honeywell International Inc. has won a contract worth $2.6 billion to manage Sandia National Laboratories, a research laboratory that specializes in national security, nuclear weapons and other projects deemed vital for the U.S., federal officials said Friday.

The U.S. Energy Department’s National Nuclear Security Administration identified the winning bidder as National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, a division of Honeywell. Northrop Grumman Corp. and Universities Research Association will support the Honeywell subsidiary in managing Sandia National Laboratories.

----
From the Los Alamos Daily Post

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) announced today it has awarded National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia (NTESS) with the management and operating contract for Sandia National Laboratories (SNL).
NTESS is a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International. Northrup Grumman and Universities Research Association will support NTESS in the performance of this contract. The award is valued at $2.6 billion annually over 10 years, if all options are exercised.

============

The original post is correct. It did not say that university's would not be involved in SNL, only that the M&O contractor does not have a university as a "owner" or direct partner, unlike the other bidders as noted in the Albuquerque Business Journal....

"The bidding war for a $2.6 billion contract to manage Sandia National Laboratories is over.

The U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration announced Friday it has chosen a Honeywell subsidiary to take over management and operate the labs and its multibillion dollar budget.

National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, beat out teams that included presences from the University of New Mexico, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and New Mexico State University. It also bested Lockheed Martin Corp., which has held the contract since 1993 through its wholly owned subsidiary Sandia Corp.

In May, the University of New Mexico announced it was joining independent research and development group Battelle and aerospace giant Boeing, along with Texas A&M and the University of Texas in a team called “Together Sandia" in a bid for management of Sandia National Laboratories.

Then in July, Lockheed Martin announced that the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and New Mexico State University had joined the company in a bid to manage the lab, along with Purdue University."
Anonymous said…
4:05 PM is delusional.
EOM
Anonymous said…
December 18, 2016 at 5:09 PM

Once again, what's delusional about the facts.

SNL employees are employees of a subsidiary currently solely owned by Lockheed-Martin and in the near future will be employees of a subsidiary solely owned by Honeywell.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!