Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Friday, April 18, 2008

Miller's announcement

Emphasizing that it is a “difficult decision but the right decision,” Director George Miller outlined the Lab’s approved Involuntary Separation Program (ISP) Thursday during meetings for employees and managers.

Earlier this week, the Department of Energy approved the Lab’s Involuntary Separation Program as part of its 3161 Workforce Restructuring Program. The ISP will reduce up to 535 career indefinite positions at the Laboratory. As a result approximately 200 operations positions, 200 science and technology positions, 100 Director’s Office positions and 35 program positions could be eliminated.

As required by federal law, the Laboratory sent out WARN Act notifications to approximately 3,200 Laboratory employees Thursday afternoon. The notifications are required for any employee who could be part of the layoff pool. Any employee who was not excluded from taking the Voluntary Self Select Option Program (VSSOP) will receive a letter.

However, Miller and Art Wong of Strategic Human Capital Management reminded employees that receiving a WARN Act letter does not mean the employee also will receive a layoff notice.

Those employees selected for layoffs will receive official notice the week of May 19. Those employees will leave the Laboratory the week of May 19 through September according to years of service.

The need for a workforce reduction is necessitated by multiple factors — cost of the Lab management contract, a federal budget that was $100 million lower in FY 2008 and that remains uncertain for FY 2009 and higher operating costs. The cost of supporting direct missions for the Laboratory is nearly $1billion, or approximately two thirds of the Lab’s overall budget.

While the Laboratory has streamlined some of its operating costs, a workforce reduction coupled with ongoing efforts to reduce costs, “will ensure we meet our goals for FY09,” Miller said. “We’re implementing our plan to deal with our $280 million shortfall and to reduce the Lab’s cost of doing business in FY 2009 to the same as FY 2007.”

“This has been a difficult path forward. It’s dramatic, and I have no illusions how hard this is,” Miller added. “But I am convinced it’s the right thing to do.”

Miller also cautioned it “will take a lot of empathy and sympathy for the emotions going around,” and he cautioned everyone to be vigilant with regard to safety and security. “In these times it’s very easy to get distracted and that can have serious security and safety consequences; it’s critical we remain focused on our safety and security.”

Wong outlined the ISP process and the efforts each Principal Associate Director has gone through to recommend a plan of action. A Layoff Policy Implementation Review Committee also was formed to ensure fairness, consistency and adherence to policy.

As previously reported, layoffs are based on skills, knowledge and abilities for scientists and engineers (the 200 job series), and seniority for all other job classifications. Seniority is calculated by full-time equivalent months of continuous service. Severance is calculated using the employee’s base salary rate (hourly rate at 100 percent time) and the employee’s length of continuous service.

All job classifications, along with any scientist or engineer with less than 10 years of experience, may receive up to 30 days pay in lieu of notice, along with one week of severance pay per year of service, up to 26 weeks.

Scientists and engineers with more than 10 years service also will receive one week of severance per year of service, up to 26 weeks. Scientists and engineers with more than 10 years of service will not recieve pay in lieu of notice. Instead they will work out of a transition area for the remainder of their notice period. Scientists with more than 10 years but less than 15 will receive 60 days’ calendar notice; more than 15 years but less than 20 receive 90 days’ notice; and more than 20 years of service will receive 120 days’ notice.

The Laboratory will open a resource center to assist affected employees targeted for layoff with benefits, severance and separation and job search assistance. The center’s location will be announced at a later date.

“The goal is to treat these employees with the dignity they deserve,” Wong said.

Starting today, employees who were not excluded from VSSOP may check LAPIS for their seniority and severance calculations.

In addition, Strategic Human Capital Management will be holding briefings at noon April 24, 28 and 30 to further discuss layoff policy details, benefits information and resources available. Information, including slides from Miller’s and Wong’s presentations, also will be posted on the Retooling the Laboratory Website.

Miller closed each meeting by reminding “these are very trying and difficult times for the entire Lab, and it’s important we be sensitive to the variety of emotions.

“As painful and difficult is is, it is the right thing to do. A lot of people will continue to look to us to provide solutions to the important issues of our time.”

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Please help. I need to know the breakdown for non 200 series employees. How are years of service established? In other words, I've been a 502.3 for five years. Will the pecking order for years of service be evaluated accorded to other 502.3's, or will it be entire years of service as a 500 series? I have 18 years as a 500 series, but only 5 years as Sr. Tech. Which is it based on?

Also, is it seniority within your dept., or lab-wide?

Anonymous said...

Regarding the Director's talk yesterday, I wonder who is going to pay the salaries of all the people sentenced to the "Transition Center"? Certainly not the Programs! Perhaps more will be required of the Indirect budget? One other point, will ULM be removing the funding from the organizations used to pay the salaries of the 535FTE + 180 Flex/SLE employees about to be laid off? Or will ULM let the organizations that now have fewer people to pay for (like Plant Engineering) keep the money to make up for their current budget "shortfalls"? Comments?

Anonymous said...

April 18, 2008 4:00 PM

They wil simply lay off more 500 and 300 to pay their salaries.Isn't that the fix for all their problems.

Anonymous said...

April 18, 2008 12:36 PM

I thought it was year of unbroken service att LLNL regadless of what classification you are. It's seems to be all about time in service not time in a classification or division. Someone who knows please tell us all.

Anonymous said...

"I have 18 years as a 500 series, but only 5 years as Sr. Tech. Which is it based on"

I am pretty sure it is based on your four digit classification which means you could be in deep poo.

Anonymous said...

Seniority is based on last hire date. The layoff units (or bins) are by organization, then classification to the fourth digit, and then by last hire date.

For example, in an organization that has 5xx.1, 5xx.2, and 5xx.3, there would be three lists and each list would be sorted by last hire date --- in other words, not when you reclassed into your current classification, but when you hired into the lab (breaks in service can effect that date).

Assuming you haven't had a break in service, you would have 18 years within the 502.3 classification within whatever layoff unit you end up in. Someone who hired into your organization as a 502.3, say 5 years ago, WOULD only have 5 years of seniority, and will have bigger problems. Same is true for young hot shots who have moved up through the ranks quickly. And that's why so many people are upset about the seniority-based layoff policy for non-200s.

Anonymous said...

"thought it was year of unbroken service att LLNL regadless of what classification you are. It's seems to be all about time in service not time in a classification or division. Someone who knows please tell us all."

You are correct kind of. What you need to understand is it is years of unbroken service compared to the other folks in your four digit classification. Say you have 10 years at the lab and you were just reclassified. for the purposes of determining your status everyone in your four digit job classification (within your division) is ranked according to years of service.So if you just moved to a classification with a bunch of guys who have 20 years at the lab you are hosed.

Anonymous said...

April 18, 2008 7:17 PM

You are miss informed and if you go to Lapus, and read through the Q&A's it clearly states its your hire date coupled with continious service regarles of how many years you have been in your classification...
But lets face it.. reality is they will find a way to get rid of any of us they want to..its open season.. 49.999 of us at a time!
Let the most important game of your job begin!!

Anonymous said...

Sad but true. I wish you all the best of luck, or from my perspective, God bless and keep you and your's.

Anonymous said...

April 18, 2008 8:12 PM

Actually, I am right. You mis interpreted what I have written. if you have 10 year of service, you have 10 years of service (continuous). If you find yourself in four digit classification with people who have more service you are at risk. If you find yourself in a classification where they all have less you are in fine shape. If you have moved from a classification where you were the guy with the most years of service into a classification where you now find that everyone else has been at the lab longer than you, you are in trouble. That is pretty simple and that is the way it is.

Anonymous said...

OK, this is why I am upset. I was hired as a 500 series in July 2002. Right after that, 500 series were all flex term, thus when I am up for the axe chances are I get it because there were no FTEs after that point in my job class. So just as a circumstance I am screwed even though I got promoted and made real progress with my effort and career here. Me thinks it is a good thing if I am axed, because seriously, if for some reason I stay, I will not be happy here because I distrust all the ULM. Bye bye I guess, for those that are staying, do not ever think you are safe.

Anonymous said...

April 18, 2008 9:12 PM

You should be upset. You are correct in your assessment. I too find myself in the same situation as you. What is unknown is what classifications have been targeted. I doubt we will know until mid May when layoff notices are sent out. In the meantime you should take some solace in the fact that only about 100 need to go from engineering.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days